Showing posts with label AUM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AUM. Show all posts

Monday, February 3, 2020

Insurance vs Investment

We are into the month of February, the eleventh month of the financial year which spans from April to March. Historically the last three months of the financial year, i.e. Jan to March, have seen an increased demand for Insurance products in India. This is because the premium paid for Insurance products qualify for a tax deduction under section 80C of the Income Tax act up to an annual limit of Rs 150,000. This is quite liberal a limit for most Indians where the average annual per capita income is only Rs 135,048 (ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_in_India). In a country where the largest insurance company LIC – is owned by the government, Insurance companies and their agents have found it relatively easy to sell Insurance products to the vast Indian middle class on the basis of tax savings that will accrue to them for paying Insurance premiums. This narrative has not only suited the Government coffers very well (LIC paid a dividend of Rs 2,610cr to the Indian Government for 2018-19) but also the mindset of the Indian middle class which has been conditioned over the years into saving its hard earned income in tax saving instruments instead of investing it. Consequently millions of middle class Indians even today are more comfortable buying a LIC policy instead of investing in an investment product such as a Mutual Fund.

Truth be told, this mindset worked well during the post independence era when the Mutual Industry in India either did not exist or was in a nascent stage. However ever since the emergence of private sector mutual funds in 1993 and the stringent regulations put in place by SEBI since 1996, the Indian mutual Fund Industry has taken off and since 2004 has evolved into a mature financial industry with Assets under management (AUM) of more than Rs 27 lakh crores at the end of 2019 (ref https://www.amfiindia.com/indian-mutual).  In fact the AUM of Mutual Funds in India has registered a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25 per cent over the five year period from 2013-2018, outstripping the CAGR of only 11 per cent registered by aggregate bank deposits of scheduled commercial banks during this period (ref https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in). Consequently the vast Indian middle class needs to wake up and re-condition its mindset and see-through the sharp sales pitch of Insurance agents who peddle Insurance products to them solely on the basis of tax savings.

Insurance is an entirely different requirement from Investing. Insurance takes care of the protection needs of the individual – due to sudden events related to life, job or health – whereas Investing addresses the topic of wealth generation for building a nest egg for your entire life. Therefore whenever Insurance is being sold as an Investment, you should de-link the Insurance need from the Investment need and only consider buying the Insurance portion (Term Insurance) to satisfy your protection needs and then invest the difference. Combining Term Insurance with Investments in the form of Savings plans or Endowment plans locks investors into long term commitments into products where there are expensive management fees and associated agent commissions which is a drain on the individual’s hard earned money.

The Finance budget for 2020 has taken a welcome step in this direction by giving taxpayers the option to decline these exemptions in order to avail a lower income tax rate. This is a soft signal from the Government that individuals are free to make their own choices for their saving requirements and should not rely solely on the tax incentives provided with Insurance products for this purpose. This option will force all taxpayers to now calculate whether they are better off availing the tax exemptions and paying a higher tax rate or declining the exemptions for paying a lower tax rate. In this process, the re-conditioning of the mindset to buy Insurance products solely for the purpose of saving tax will automatically take place. It is quite possible that existing investors who are heavily invested in Insurance products may choose to avail these exemptions. However new entrants to the job market and other young investors will certainly want to make their own savings decisions and avail a lower tax rate. Both classes of investors will do well to reach out to a qualified Registered Investment Adviser to guide them through this change.

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Do you know your fund’s TER?

Like a growing number of Indian investors, you most likely invest in Mutual Funds on a regular basis. You are also perhaps aware that Mutual Funds charge a certain percentage of their Assets under Management (AUM) for managing the fund. This expense is known as the Total Expense Ratio (TER) and it is a number regulated by SEBI. The maximum TER that funds can charge as management fees depends on the size and type of the fund, as shown below:


AUM slab (Rs cr)
Equity oriented schemes – max TER%
Debt oriented schemes – max TER%
0-500
2.25
2.00
500-750
2.00
1.75
750-2000
1.75
1.50
2000-5000
1.60
1.35
5000-10000
1.50
1.25
10000-15000
1.45
1.20
15000-20000
1.40
1.15
20000-25000
1.35
1.10
25000-30000
1.30
1.05
30000-35000
1.25
1.00
35000-40000
1.20
0.95
40000-45000
1.15
0.90
45000-50000
1.10
0.85
More than 50000
1.05
0.80


As of end of Aug 2019, there were 269 active equity oriented mutual fund schemes in India, with AUMs ranging from a high of 25,069cr to a low of just 0.64cr (source: www.amfiindia.com). Since fund size determines the maximum TER that can be levied by the AMC, it is important for investors to know the fund size before short-listing it. At the top of the scale of 2.25%, every Rs 1000 invested by investors can lead to a fee income of Rs 22.50 for the AMC. This is an annually recurring fee which will be deducted every year - in fact it is deducted proportionally from the NAV every day. What this also means is that if the fund returns 15% per annum before fees, the investor will only get a return of 12.75% after fees. In fact, since management fees are deducted from the NAV on a daily basis, investors will actually get much less than 12.75% on an annualized basis due to the compounding effect of the daily fees. Hence everything else being equal, a fund with a lower TER is always desirable.

A lower TER is even more desirable for debt funds whose expected annual returns are much less than equity funds. Note that as per SEBI guidelines, the maximum TER for a debt oriented fund is only 25 basis points lower than equity oriented funds in the same slab, although the returns for a debt fund can be less than half that of an equity fund over a longer duration. This means that a lower TER is critical during debt fund short-listing, since a higher TER can eat away a significant portion of the absolute returns of the fund.

What to Do

One way to get a lower TER is to always invest in mutual funds with the Direct plan option. This one action alone can reduce the TER by more than 50% compared to the Regular plan of the same fund. Consider the following table that shows the average TER for the three categories of funds for Regular and Direct plans (source: www.valueresearchonline.com)

Fund Category
Regular plan average TER
Direct plan average TER
Savings in Direct plan
Equity
2.02%
1.22%
39.6%
Hybrid
1.96%
0.98%
50.0%
Debt
0.9%
0.42%
53.3%

Since Direct plans offer savings of more than 50% over Regular plans, it is pretty obvious that every investor should opt for them by default. The question then is how to shortlist Direct funds without the help of a Mutual Fund Distributor (MFD) since they will only offer you funds with the Regular plan. You have two choices here – the first choice is to learn to do it yourself. Apart from the pleasure of saving money you will also have the satisfaction of gaining some investing knowledge in the process. If this option is not feasible for you for any reason, then the next best option for you is to hire the services of a SEBI Registered Investment Adviser (RIA) who will charge you a part of your savings for providing his/her services. In this case you will save a little less money but will have the benefit of professional selection of funds as per your risk profile and goals as well as the facility of reaching out to an investment professional any time during the service period. Both options will save you money and have their own benefits – the choice really is yours. An informed investor is always a wiser investor!